Aim:
The end of private ownership
Means:
The anti-Kulak Campaign
Consequences:
Disruption on the Land
Peasant bewilderment
Catastrophic fall in food production
Reprisals against the peasants
Hunger and Famine
Government failure to deal with famine
3. Industrialization
- Stalin's intent: establish war economy
- successful production of iron, steel, and oils= preparedness for war against capitalists
- Russian industrialization coincided with Western depression (same time as US great depression)
- Stalins industrialization happened in 5, Five-Year Plans (FYPs)
- From 1928 until Stalin's Death (1955) except war years (41-45)
- 1st FYP: oct 1928- Dec 1932
- 2nd FYP: Jan 1933-Dec1937
- 3rd FYP: Jan 1938-Jun 1941
- 4th FYP: Jan 1946-Dec1950
- 5th FYP: Jan 1951-Dec 1955
FIRST FIVE YEAR PLAN
- Laid out quotas, but failed to describe means of achieving quotas
- Local officials falsified figures to make it seem like they had met quotas
- Thus, actual statistics of the first five-year plan are unclear
- Thinking quotas were being met, Stalin made higher quotas (twice)
- "optimal" plan 1932-33
- "Revised" plan 1932
- Actual Number much lower
- Whole FYP= huge propaganda project
- Young people, biggest supporters, thought they were truly making a difference
- Economic changes, an attempt to create a new type of human Homo sovieticus (Soviet Man)
- Stalin told Soviet Writers they should regard themselves as "engineers of the human soul"
- Despite fudged-figures the first FYP did dramatically increase production (coal, iron, & electricity)
- output of finished textiles actually declined
- Living conditions declined
- no "material rewards" for hard workers
- Any resistance= sabotage against the USSR
- Trials put on & publicized in an attempt to whip the masses into shape
- "Gigantomania": The worship of size for its own sake (Stalin: Quantity/ Size over Quality)
- Stalin used Party Cadres (Party members sent to spy on managers and workers) to terrorize workforce
- Failure to meet quotas, do good work, or show up on time= enemy of the state/ saboteur
- More realistic quotas
- Same lack of co-ordination (over-production in some parts of industry, under production in other areas)
- Materials hard to come by, fierce competition between regions & sectors of industry to get needed materials (so as not to fall short on quotas)
- When production broke down, huge groups were accused of 'sabotage' and sent to concentration camps
- Workers encouraged to work @ high intensity to produce way above set quotas- called "Storming"
- In the long run, actually reduced productivity
- Unions became a means by which the gov't imposed its regulations on the workers
- Strikes and demands for higher wages outlawed
- Wages increased, but inflation made standards of living lower
- Steel, Oil, Electricity, and Coal production hugely increased
- Agriculture secondary to industrial needs
- 1941 German invasion effectively destroyed the third FYP
Did Stalin's FYPs benefit the soviet union and its people or was it solely to consolidate Stalin's power? Some key historian's thoughts:
- Alec Nove:
- Collectivism & industrialization- bad economics
- upheaval of land & misery of peasants- didn't produce necessary industrial growth
- living conditions deteriorated
- Robert Conquest
- "Stalinism is one way of attaining industrialization just as cannibalism is one way of attaining a high protein diet"
- Leonard Shapiro
- Thought that the growth under Stalin could have also been achieved if the tzars stayed in power
- Norman Stone
- ^ agreed w/ shapiro. Without already existing expertise and infrastructure the FYPs would have failed
- Shelia Fitzpatrick
- Criticized Stalin's "gigantomania" saying it distorted the already strained economy
- However, Stalin was trying to bring stability to a nation in turmoil.
- Dmitri Volkogonov (an actual soviet soldier/ administrator)
- Economic plans, a test of loyalty (only incidentally economic plans)
- Peter Gattrell
- Stalinism was harsh, but prepared the Soviet union for four years of the most harsh of modern warfare
- the only way that the Soviet Union could have been modernized?
- David Hoffman
- Instated of sending the USSR forward, the FYPs actually sent Russia into a state of neo-traditionalism- heavily reliant on blat
- blat- Russian word meaning a system operating through bribes, favors, and connections